Historically Thinking
Historically Thinking
Worse Than Hell
0:00
-1:28:11

Worse Than Hell

W. Fitzhugh Brundage on Prisoners of War and Prison Camps of the American Civil War

Published on February 25, 2026 [Episode 445]


Introduction

During the American Civil War an estimated 194,000 Union soldiers and 214,000 Confederate soldiers became prisoners of war. No prior or subsequent American conflict has seen such numbers. During the Second World War, approximately 124,000 Americans were held captive, but the chance of being captured in that conflict was roughly one in one hundred; during the Civil War it was closer to one in five. Captivity was not a marginal experience. It was central to the war.

Indeed, the gigantic scale of prisoner-of-war camps was one of the conflict’s most consequential innovations. Every modern war since has produced successors to Andersonville, Point Lookout, Rock Island, and Florence. Yet prisoner-of-war camps remain oddly peripheral in our narratives of the Civil War, overlooked both as institutional innovations and as formative experiences for soldiers and their families. My guest, W. Fitzhugh Brundage, argues in A Fate Worse Than Hell: American Prisoners of the Civil War that captivity reshaped military policy, political rhetoric, racial attitudes, and postwar memory. Prison camps were not aberrations; they were integral to the modernizing logic of total war.

If you value serious conversations about the past—conversations that examine institutions and moral ambiguity rather than merely retelling battles—subscribe to Historically Thinking. New episodes appear every Wednesday.

About the Guest

W. Fitzhugh Brundage is the William B. Umstead Professor of History at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. An eminent historian of the American South, he has written extensively on lynching, racial violence, and debates over torture in American history. He previously appeared on Historically Thinking in Episode 327 to discuss A New History of the American South, which he edited.


🎧 Listen here on Substack, or on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you download your podcasts.


Reflection Questions

  1. Why have prisoner-of-war camps remained marginal in Civil War narratives despite their scale and significance?

  2. In what ways did captivity reshape not only military policy but also public memory and political rhetoric?

  3. What does the experience of mass captivity during the Civil War reveal about the emergence of modern warfare?


For Further Investigation


Related Episodes

  • De rebus civilibus Americanis

  • De memoria et bello

  • De humanitate in bello


Share

If you know someone interested in the Civil War, in the history of warfare, or in how institutions transform suffering into policy and memory, consider sharing this conversation.


Tags

Civil War · Military History · Prisoners of War · Memory · W. Fitzhugh Brundage · American History

Discussion about this episode

User's avatar

Ready for more?