Originally published on October 21, 2020 (Episode 182)
Introduction
When Alexander of Macedonia took the throne of his father Philip, he inherited an expansive and wealthy kingdom; a hardened and meticulously constructed army; and a cadre of aristocrats and nobles who were used to victory—and wanted more of it. Alexander was also well-educated—in part by none other than Aristotle—and a military veteran.
But when Philip took the throne, he possessed none of these advantages. It is impossible to understand the campaigns of Alexander against Persia, and how they transformed Eurasia, without first understanding Philip of Macedon and what he accomplished.
Such is the premise of Adrian Goldsworthy’s new history, Philip and Alexander: Kings and Conquerors.
About the Guest
Adrian Goldsworthy is a historian and novelist who lives in southern Wales. Known for his works on the ancient world and military history, he is the author of numerous books, including Caesar: Life of a Colossus and Augustus: First Emperor of Rome. This marks his third appearance on Historically Thinking.
For Further Investigation
Adrian Goldsworthy, Philip and Alexander: Kings and Conquerors (Basic Books, 2020)
Adrian Goldsworthy, Caesar: Life of a Colossus (2006)
Adrian Goldsworthy, Augustus: First Emperor of Rome (2014)
Robin Lane Fox, Alexander the Great (1973)
Ian Worthington, By the Spear: Philip II, Alexander the Great, and the Rise and Fall of the Macedonian Empire (2014)
Listen & Discuss
Do you think Philip’s legacy overshadows—or is overshadowed by—Alexander? Share your reflections in the comments, and forward this episode to a friend fascinated by ancient history.
Share this post